Checked on 16 October 2026 at approximately 10:10 am AEDT, before Tesla's presentation. The specifications below describe earlier promises where stated. They are not a test of the newly revealed car, and the photograph shows the earlier prototype. Every figure is attributed in the Sources at the end.
Tesla's new Roadster is approaching another reveal, and Australian enthusiasts have good reason to watch closely. At the time of checking on Friday morning, 16 October, Tesla's Australian Roadster page (opens in a new tab) displayed a live countdown ending at approximately noon Sydney time. It did not display an Australian purchase price or customer delivery date. That distinction matters: the countdown is to a presentation, not to a car arriving in an Australian garage.
The attraction is obvious. An electric sports car that combines extraordinary acceleration with a removable roof could be something special. But our view at MotorLoop remains that a sports car has to offer more than an impressive launch. We want steering that rewards attention, brakes that keep their composure and a car you want to drive again after the first passenger reaction has worn off.
The reveal date and Australian viewing times
Tesla's official announcement (opens in a new tab) moved the event to 15 October in the United States, citing forecast severe weather and the need to hold the event outdoors. That falls on 16 October in Australia. The 1 October date in our earlier coverage has been superseded.
There is a small but useful distinction between the advertised stream opening and the presentation countdown. Reporting (opens in a new tab) gives the stream's opening as 7:55 pm US Central local time, equivalent to 11:55 am Sydney and Melbourne time. Tesla's live countdown (opens in a new tab), inspected directly, pointed to approximately 12 noon. Allow those five minutes and follow the live page if the schedule changes.
| Feature | Reported stream opening, 16 October | Countdown endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra and Hobart | 11:55 am AEDT | Noon AEDT |
| Adelaide | 11:25 am ACDT | 11:30 am ACDT |
| Brisbane | 10:55 am AEST | 11 am AEST |
| Darwin | 10:25 am ACST | 10:30 am ACST |
| Perth | 8:55 am AWST | 9 am AWST |
These are conversions of the reported local Central time and the observed countdown, rather than separate Australian event announcements. The official Roadster page (opens in a new tab) is the starting point for viewing.
What the original Roadster promised
Tesla's own recording of its original presentation (opens in a new tab) establishes the baseline. Musk described a three-motor, all-wheel-drive car with four seats and a removable roof, and said availability was expected in 2020. Those are historical statements, not confirmation of the specification being unveiled now.
Claims in the original presentation
- Acceleration
- 0–60 mph in 1.9 s; 0–100 mph in 4.2 s
- Top speed
- More than 250 mph, approximately 402 km/h
- Battery
- 200 kWh
- Range
- 620 miles, described as approximately 1,000 km
- Layout
- Three motors, all-wheel drive
- Cabin and roof
- Four seats in a 2+2 arrangement; removable roof
The date is the lesson here. A presentation can establish a manufacturer's ambition without establishing when a customer will receive a finished vehicle. The new event needs to clarify which of those earlier commitments survive and which belong to a superseded design.

How to read the performance claims
A useful launch specification needs its test conditions beside it. For acceleration, we would look for the starting procedure, surface, tyres, battery state, temperature and whether the quoted result uses any thruster assistance. We would also ask whether the car can repeat the result after several runs.
The units deserve care. Sixty miles per hour is approximately 96.6 km/h, so a 0–60 mph number cannot simply be relabelled as a 0–100 km/h result. A comparison table that silently switches the two exaggerates what has actually been measured.
Likewise, a single fast demonstration does not answer the questions a track driver asks. How does the braking feel after repeated hard stops? How predictable is the car as grip changes? Does the driver get clear feedback, and how much preparation is required before another fast run? Those are questions for a measured road and circuit evaluation, not conclusions available from a teaser.
For range, we would want the test cycle and the production configuration. A headline distance without those details is difficult to use for planning a weekend trip. The same applies to charging: peak power alone tells a buyer less than the time needed to replenish a useful portion of the battery under stated conditions.
What the SpaceX package claim actually says
In his original 2018 announcement (opens in a new tab), Musk proposed roughly ten small thrusters distributed around the Roadster. He said they would assist acceleration, top speed, braking and cornering, and suggested that flight might be possible. The wording was a proposal and prediction; it did not establish a delivered feature.
The widely discussed cold-gas idea has a real engineering basis. NASA's propulsion reference (opens in a new tab) describes cold-gas propulsion as producing thrust by expelling gas through a nozzle without combustion. It also describes limited total impulse and the trade-off between performance and propellant storage. That explains the general technology; it does not validate Tesla's particular implementation.
For a buyer, the important questions are practical. How many assisted manoeuvres are available? What restores the supply? How long does that take? What maintenance does the installation need? What happens when the system cannot operate, and which performance figures remain available then?
A short lift or hover, if demonstrated, would answer only a narrow question about that demonstration. It would not establish sustained flight, a customer-ready feature or permission to use it on Australian roads. We are not declaring a future version legal or illegal without the actual specification and applicable approval. The useful evidence would be a clear statement of operating limits and the markets in which Tesla intends to sell that configuration.
The competition has moved on
The Roadster now faces published electric performance benchmarks that make a simple claim of exceptional acceleration less distinctive.
Porsche quotes 2.2 seconds from 0–100 km/h for its Taycan Turbo GT with the Weissach package and a 305 km/h top speed. Its technical release (opens in a new tab) also discusses braking, aerodynamics, weight reduction and circuit performance. That breadth is relevant: it describes more of the driving task than a standing start alone.
Rimac reports 1.72 seconds from 0–100 km/h and 25.79 seconds for 0–400–0 km/h for the Nevera R, with the validation exercise independently verified by Dewesoft according to Rimac (opens in a new tab). These are attributed manufacturer-published results; MotorLoop did not conduct those tests.
Neither is a direct substitute for an open-roof Roadster, and these figures are not a controlled three-car comparison. They demonstrate why the new Tesla needs to be judged against contemporary evidence. We would want equivalent units, comparable conditions and clarity about the exact version before ranking it against either car.
US reservations are not an Australian price
Tesla's US reservation page (opens in a new tab), inspected directly for this briefing, asks for US$5,000 initially, followed by a US$45,000 wire transfer within ten days. It says a reservation is not final until that transfer is received, and the page labels the amount due today as fully refundable. The two payments total US$50,000; that is a reservation amount, not the vehicle's advertised purchase price.
The page's brief refund label should not be expanded into assumptions about every payment or an Australian contract. A prospective buyer should read the agreement actually offered for their market, including the refund process and what, if anything, the payment guarantees.
We are not converting a historical American price into an Australian drive-away estimate. Without a current Australian offer, doing so would imply a level of certainty that buyers do not have. A useful local quotation would identify the exact version, included equipment, delivery arrangements and total payable amount.
The Australian ownership questions
Before treating the Roadster as a purchase option, we would want Tesla to answer the following in writing.
- Availability: Will Australia receive the car, in which configuration, and with right-hand drive?
- Delivery: Is the date a production target, an allocation estimate or a committed customer handover?
- Price and reservation: What is payable in Australian dollars, and what rights does the reservation agreement provide?
- Warranty: What covers the battery, drivetrain and any optional thruster hardware, including exclusions for track use?
- Service: Which Australian facilities will handle the car, and what arrangements apply to specialised components?
- Charging: Which connections and charging capabilities will the Australian car have, and what charging times are supported by test conditions?
- Repairs and ownership: What support will exist for diagnostics, replacement components and the software needed to keep the car usable?
These are the questions we would bring to a low-volume performance-car purchase. They are not allegations that Tesla will fail to provide support. They matter because the ownership experience lasts much longer than the reveal.
Our preference is for a sports car whose owner can understand its needs and obtain the parts and expertise to keep it working. A spectacular new system should come with an equally clear explanation of how it will be maintained.
Our view on fast versus felt
MotorLoop's earlier Roadster piece asked whether fast is the same as felt. We still think that is the interesting enthusiast question, but it needs to remain an opinion rather than a verdict on a car we have not driven.
Some drivers love the immediacy and quiet of an electric drivetrain. Others value the changing sound of an engine, the rhythm of a gearshift and the involvement of working with a machine. We lean towards the latter experience. That preference does not prove an electric sports car cannot be engaging.
The new Roadster could give Tesla an opportunity to make its case through steering, seating position, pedal response, visibility and the simple pleasure of driving with the roof removed. We would welcome a car that makes those things memorable. We would be less persuaded by a presentation that leaves the ordinary driving experience unexplained.
After the dramatic acceleration run, do you want to take the long way home? That answer will require a real drive.
What would make this reveal meaningful
The most useful announcement would connect the demonstration to a defined customer product: final configurations, a transparent test basis, a credible manufacturing programme and market-specific ordering information.
A reveal, production start and customer delivery should be reported as separate milestones. For Australia, local availability deserves its own confirmation as well. Moving one of those milestones forward does not automatically settle the others.
We are keen to see the engineering. We also want the quieter details that let an enthusiast judge whether the Roadster belongs on a shortlist. Show the car, explain how it works, and make the path to owning and maintaining it clear.
FAQs
Has the new Tesla Roadster launched yet?
At this briefing's research cutoff on the morning of 16 October 2026 in Sydney, Tesla's official page was still counting down to the reveal. This is pre-event coverage, not a report that production or customer deliveries have begun.
Is there a confirmed Australian price or delivery date?
Neither appeared on the Australian Roadster page inspected for this briefing. An Australian purchase price and a delivery commitment should be established through Tesla's local offer rather than inferred from US reservations.
Are the original specifications the specifications of the new car?
They should be treated as historical claims until Tesla identifies the production specification. The original presentation is linked in the Sources so readers can distinguish that proposal from subsequent announcements.
Will the Roadster fly?
Musk proposed thruster assistance and the possibility of flight. That statement does not establish a purchasable flying feature or approval for road use. A demonstration would need to be assessed against its stated limits.
Is this a MotorLoop road test?
No. This is a sourced launch briefing with a clearly identified editorial view. Driving impressions, measured performance and long-term ownership conclusions would require different evidence.
Sources
- Tesla Australia — Roadster page (opens in a new tab)
- Tesla — Roadster page and live countdown (opens in a new tab)
- Tesla — rescheduling announcement (opens in a new tab)
- Electrek — livestream timing report, 13 October 2026 (opens in a new tab)
- Tesla — original presentation, Roadster segment from approximately 28 minutes (opens in a new tab)
- Elon Musk — original SpaceX package post, 2018 (opens in a new tab)
- NASA — State-of-the-Art Small Spacecraft Technology, In-Space Propulsion, Cold Gas section (opens in a new tab)
- Porsche — Taycan Turbo GT technical release (opens in a new tab)
- Rimac — Nevera R validation announcement (opens in a new tab)
- Tesla — US reservation page (opens in a new tab)
- Wikimedia Commons — original photograph and licence record (opens in a new tab) · CC BY 2.0 licence (opens in a new tab)
