Skip to main content
Sports & performance

The Bathurst 1000 was decided by a fuel gauge, and that is why we still watch

Team 18's leader slowed on the last climb after a short-fuelled stop, handing Bathurst to Kostecki. We think a race won by a tank, not a charger, is the point.

By John Maya · Last updated 13 October 2026

A pack of Supercars racing nose to tail at the Bathurst 1000.

With three laps to go at Mount Panorama on Sunday, Anton De Pasquale was leading the Bathurst 1000 and nose to tail with two rivals. By the top of the mountain he was slowing, and a car that had looked certain to win was a lap down. The winners were Brodie Kostecki and Todd Hazelwood in the #17 Dick Johnson Racing Mustang.

According to Autosport's race report (opens in a new tab), Team 18 short-fuelled De Pasquale at his final stop to gain track position, "but overdid it". The Chevrolet Camaro slowed on the final climb up Mountain Straight and was classified a lap down. We'd call that a very Bathurst ending.

In Australia

The race ran at record pace in near-perfect conditions with no safety car until lap 156 of 161, Autosport reports (opens in a new tab). Chaz Mostert hit the wall at Forrest's Elbow with five laps to go, and the safety car that followed set up the fuel gamble. Kostecki's own day was far from clean: his car lost more than 25 seconds at its penultimate stop when a brake rotor would not mount on the hub. His summary: "the Mountain always chooses the winner."

The cars burn a purpose-made fuel. For 2026 BP supplies Supercars (opens in a new tab) with a blend of 85 per cent ethanol and 15 per cent bio-gasoline made from waste material. BP describes it as 100 per cent from renewable materials, based on third-party certified feedstock, and says it is not sold to the public at BP stations.

A pack of Supercars racing nose to tail at the Bathurst 1000.
Photo: thomasrdotorg, via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0.

The world view

Endurance racing elsewhere has been moving the same way: keep the combustion engine, change what goes in the tank. TotalEnergies supplied all 62 cars at the 2022 24 Hours of Le Mans (opens in a new tab) with a fuel made partly from wine-production by-products, which the company says cuts lifecycle CO2 by at least 65 per cent. That figure is the company's own claim and we have not seen it independently checked.

Another perspective: France

Le Mans is also a fuel-and-stops race, so France is the closest comparison. The shared lesson is that the fuel can be reinvented while the format, a driver, a tank and a pit stop, stays intact.

Our take

This is our view. A fuel gamble works as drama because the stakes are simple and visible: a tank fills in seconds, and a team can get the number wrong on the last lap. Everyone watching understands what happened.

We think that's what gets lost when racing talks about the future. Petrol and ethanol infrastructure is already built, paid for and working in every country the sport visits. The Bathurst ending happened because the fuel, the cars and the mountain are all things a fan can see and understand. We would rather racing keep the engines and keep inventing fuels than lose that.

That isn't a swipe at anyone who wants an electric car for the commute. It's a plea for the drivers and fans who enjoy the journey, not just the arrival.

A fair counterpoint

Renewable-fuel claims come from the suppliers, and a fuel that isn't sold at the pump doesn't help the family hatchback. The racing case is strong; the road case is a separate argument.

Related reading

Found this useful? Share it with someone.

About this guide

The MotorLoop team — These guides are researched and maintained by the MotorLoop team, and every claim names the source that publishes it so you can check it yourself.

Last updated 13 October 2026.

← All news